Skip to main content

Questions to ask your Cybersecurity team to baseline your strengths and weaknesses

This questionnaire with scenario-based questions to evaluate a team's strengths and weaknesses in each area:

  1. Technical Skills:
  • Have team members successfully implemented network security controls, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, in previous projects?
  • Have team members successfully mitigated vulnerabilities and threats to endpoints, such as malware and phishing attacks, in previous projects?
  • Have team members successfully implemented secure coding practices and SDLC security, such as code reviews and testing, in previous projects?
  1. Incident Response Skills:
  • Has the team conducted a tabletop exercise to test their incident response plan? How did they perform?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in responding to a real security incident or breach? How did they handle the situation?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in threat intelligence and analysis, such as identifying potential threats, vulnerabilities, and attack vectors?
  1. Risk Management Skills:
  • Has the team conducted a risk assessment or audit to identify potential security risks and vulnerabilities? How did they prioritize and mitigate those risks?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in developing and implementing risk management strategies, such as risk mitigation and risk transfer?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in compliance and regulatory requirements, such as PCI DSS, GDPR, and HIPAA?
  1. Communication and Collaboration Skills:
  • Has the team successfully communicated complex technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders in previous projects?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in cross-functional collaboration with other IT teams, business units, and external partners in previous projects?
  • Has the team demonstrated experience in working with third-party vendors and service providers to ensure secure outsourcing practices in previous projects?

For each question, the user can assign a score of 3, 2, or 1, based on the team's level of experience and performance in that area:

  • 3 = Strong experience and performance
  • 2 = Moderate experience and performance, with some areas for improvement
  • 1 = Weak experience and performance, requiring significant development and improvement

The total score for each area can be tallied and compared to the rubric to identify the team's strengths and weaknesses in each area. Are you happy with your score? What is that you can do to address the gaps? Is training an option?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malware Damage - It is real and you need to be ready ...

  Malware, short for "malicious software," is any software intentionally designed to cause harm to computer systems, networks, or devices. Malware can take many forms, including viruses, trojan horses, worms, ransomware, spyware, and adware, among others. The dangers of malware are numerous, and it is crucial to protect yourself from malware to avoid serious consequences, such as: Data theft: Malware can be designed to steal personal information, such as bank account details, social security numbers, and login credentials. Once this information is stolen, it can be used for identity theft, financial fraud, and other malicious activities. System damage: Some malware can damage your computer system, causing it to crash or malfunction. This can result in lost data, system downtime, and costly repairs. Financial loss: Malware can also be used to extort money from victims. For example, ransomware can lock down a victim's computer and demand payment in exchange for the decrypti...

CIO Questions answered - Your comments welcome - The reflections of the inner self

Briefly describe the typical size and organization of an IT team that you have managed. Include the division of responsibilities, how you track progress, etc. My experience ranges from me working independently, mainly to maintain my independence when I perform audits to managing a team of more than 25 - 100 consultants in various roles. I have handled multiple projects simultaneously where we have multiple consultants (typically from five to ten) working on multiple projects. We have used a set of tools to specifically monitor progress as well as the milestones. The projects involved were simple roll out of products (Microsoft Active Directory Domain Builds, Log Consolidation, Vulnerability Management) in line with product specifications to complex integration of systems that involves building multiple SoA interfaces for healthcare applications. For a successful project there needs to be proper delegation, personally I believe a person can deliver if he is not micromanaged, identifyi...

A Roadmap to move from Cloud to In premise - The reverse migration -- Is Cloudflation at myth?

 Cloudflation as a term is being used and talks on the spiralling cost of cloud bills for an organization. The easily available and provisioning options leads to workloads that run for no reasons, orphaned accounts and a gamut of costs that are accrued by multiple departments without much of an oversight. There is a trend to reduce the workloads and have a semblance of order. It is imperative that we have plans that helps to reverse the migration to cloud and bring back some of the workloads that might work cheaper to run local. Is there a roadmap to achieve this goal? A few pointers in this direction A roadmap for moving from the cloud to in-premise computing should include the following steps: Assess current workloads: Assess the current workloads that are running on the cloud and determine which workloads would be most suitable for in-premise computing. Identify in-premise infrastructure: Identify the in-premise infrastructure that will be needed to run the identified workloads....